Qayimli

Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks vs Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks

There are 8 key differences between Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks and Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks.

Key differences

Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks vs Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks — Key differences
Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks
Manufacturer Google (manufactured by TSMC) Samsung
Fabrication 3nm (TSMC N3P) 4nm
CPU cores 7 cores 8 cores
Core configuration 1x C1-Ultra 4.11GHz + 4x C1-Pro 3.38GHz + 2x C1-Pro 2.65GHz 4x Cortex-A78 2.75GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 2.05GHz
Max clock 4.11 GHz 2.75 GHz
GPU PowerVR C-Series CXTP-48-1536 Samsung Xclipse 530 (AMD RDNA 2)
NPU Upgraded TPU (+50% performance) 6K MAC NPU
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 6E

Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks

Google Tensor G6 powers the entire Pixel 11 lineup with new Arm C1 cores and a MediaTek modem, prioritizing AI over benchmark numbers.

  • +Move to Arm's latest C1 cores and Armv9.3-A architecture.
  • +Fundamentally upgraded TPU for better AI performance.
  • +New MediaTek modem improves heat and battery drain.
  • −PowerVR GPU is much weaker than Qualcomm and MediaTek rivals.
  • −Unusual 7-core design instead of 8 affected multi-core results.
  • −Large gap in synthetic benchmarks compared to flagship Qualcomm chips.
Read the full review →

Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks

The Exynos 1480 outperforms the Helio G99 by up to 60-80%, thanks to the Xclipse 530 GPU built on AMD architecture.

  • +AMD-based Xclipse 530 GPU delivers strong performance.
  • +Advanced 4nm process for better power efficiency.
  • +Clearly outperforms rivals like the Helio G99.
  • −Higher price than rivals like the Helio G99, reflecting the stronger performance.
  • −Xclipse GPU drivers are relatively less mature than Adreno or Mali in some newer games.
Read the full review →

Full specifications

Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks vs Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks — Full specifications
Google Tensor G6 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1480 Chipset Review — Specifications and Benchmarks
Manufacturing
Manufacturer Google (manufactured by TSMC) Samsung
Fabrication 3nm (TSMC N3P) 4nm
Announced August 12, 2026 —
Availability Available Available
CPU
CPU cores 7 cores 8 cores
Core configuration 1x C1-Ultra 4.11GHz + 4x C1-Pro 3.38GHz + 2x C1-Pro 2.65GHz 4x Cortex-A78 2.75GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 2.05GHz
Max clock 4.11 GHz 2.75 GHz
Architecture Arm C1 (Lumex), Armv9.3-A —
Graphics & AI
GPU PowerVR C-Series CXTP-48-1536 Samsung Xclipse 530 (AMD RDNA 2)
GPU clock — Up to 1300MHz
NPU Upgraded TPU (+50% performance) 6K MAC NPU
AI performance On-device Gemini Nano support —
Memory & connectivity
Modem MediaTek M90 —
5G Yes Yes
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Benchmarks
AnTuTu Approximately 1.8-2 million —
Geekbench single-core Approximately 6,115 —
Geekbench multi-core Approximately 2,436 —
Extra features
Key features First Tensor chip with a MediaTek modem instead of Samsung First mid-range chip using an AMD-based GPU
Phones using it Google Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, Pixel 11 Pro Fold Samsung Galaxy A37

Other comparisons